Regarding aspect off romantic jealousy, regarding the 40 worry about-report tools was claimed because the production of the fresh Mind-Statement and you can Projective Envy Scales (Bringle, Roach, Andler Baptist tanД±Еџma sadece yorumlar, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of a lot tool were used only when. , 1992) created to determine gender differences; new Multidimensional Envy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) developed to measure the about three proportions of jealousy (intellectual, emotional and you may behavioral dimensions); this new Myspace Envy Level (Muise, Christofides, & Des) aimed at evaluating the chances of an event that causes thoughts regarding envy members regarding their craft towards Fb; this new Envy Level (Buunk, 1997), used to view around three version of envy (reactive, anxious and you can precautionary) as well as the Interpersonal Envy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and that evaluates new bad feelings through actual otherwise endangered losses of a liked individual a competition.

For the Brazil, the brand new Close Jealousy Catalog is actually modified (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) For Colombia, there are no psychometric education out of a specific measure to your intimate envy

In the Latin american context, you will find an adaptation during the Chile of your List out-of Routines of one’s Couple That can cause Jealousy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). When you look at the Mexico, a beneficial Multidimensional Measure of Jealousy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and a short study try carried out with this new Multidimensional Inventory off Intimate Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). At exactly the same time, previous studies failed to do Factorial Confirmatory Research (CFA) to be able to corroborate the fresh new basis build found, and you will reduced reliability accounts was indeed used in its issues (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise short examples were used (Mota et al., 2016).

The newest IJS set up to possess Mathes and you may Severa (1981) the most made use of bills getting contrasting close jealousy, it located half a dozen activities you to definitely gauge the susceptibility so you’re able to threats relevant to: (a) Partner’s unfaithfulness and you may relationships anybody else (circumstances step one, step 3, 12, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and twenty-five); (b) Partner’s popularity (affairs dos, step three, cuatro, 7, ten, thirteen, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) An untrustworthy partner (items 1, 4, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Lover’s dated schedules (facts 11, twenty-four, twenty-six, twenty-seven, and you can twenty-eight); (e) Lover’s apathy (things 8, 9 and you will twenty four); and you can (f) Lover’s left family which have old times and sex distinctions (facts 5 and 18).

Every tool listed above have demostrated sufficient degrees of validity and you can accuracy

You can find five degree having looked at when it comes to its accuracy and validity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) present one or two education, together with earliest data performed the construction of your own level that have 39 things, that has been shorter so you’re able to twenty-eight affairs after mathematical study. After that, inside another analysis, IJS was utilized close to other scales you to definitely analyzed romantic love-website links, insecurity, self-esteem and you can an ad hoc questionnaire out-of independent identities, guaranteeing, considering concept, that the sophisticated away from jealousy, the higher the degree of Close like together with lower the fresh separate name of the few. Within this research, we statement a beneficial coefficient of accuracy regarding .ninety five into full level. Into the a third research, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Knob (1982), so you can continue the new symptoms from authenticity, made use of the IJS as well as 2 behavioural methods: (a) possibilities when met with an opponent and you will (b) terms off possessiveness on lover, owing to a call that they built to the person who took part in the study. The latest asked correlations was indeed acquired, and that once more supported the fresh new validity of your measure. Finally, within the a fourth research, Mathes, Roter and you will Joerger (1982) corroborated the latest convergent legitimacy regarding IJS along with other scales you to definitely analyzed intimate envy.