The significant standard beta coefficient (? = –0


Реклама:

Реклама:

Сторонняя реклама


-ТестДот

The significant standard beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p citas de fitness < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

So it supported the latest hypothesis your rationalist epistemology tends with the an excellent lower standard of involvement with the Involvement subscale together with constructivist epistemology appears to your a heightened amount of involvement on Wedding subscale

Ergo, epistemology (rationalist vs. constructivist) is found to be a significant predictor off cures design. In particular, the quintessential robust results give provisional assistance for the understanding that there are specific variations in the personal types of the therapist according to therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Even more particularly, the present day data unearthed that therapists that have rationalist epistemologies tended to the much more point, a lower degree of engagement, an excellent narrower attention, and you may a heightened standard of thought inside their classes which have members, whereas, this new constructivist epistemology tended towards having a greater degree of intimacy, an increased amount of engagement, a wider notice, and more spontaneity in their therapy training. At the same time, there is certainly certain support towards the perception one therapists with constructivist epistemologies are most likely for the the guidance off autonomy as opposed to tightness during the its medication layout; although not it was maybe not a really strong seeking in today’s study.

Such results are helpful in relation to this new potentially intrinsic variations managed by the rationalist in place of constructivist epistemologies centered on procedures style. Far more specifically, latest findings support the perception that intellectual-behavioural therapies, hence show an educated depiction of one’s rationalist epistemology, care for a keen “active-directive” and you may systematic way of therapy (Granvold, 1988) that have certain requirements familiar with package the class of your own example (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Hypothesis 2-Epistemology Has an effect on new Healing Relationship

According to the 2nd hypothesis-therapists that have rationalist epistemologies have a tendency to rating higher with the Task and Goal subscales minimizing for the Bond subscale as compared to constructivist epistemologies-several other multiple linear regression model was conducted to determine if for example the exact same predictor variable (therapist epistemology) perform determine therapists’ feedback of your criterion parameters (operating alliance) considering therapists’ an incredible number of three subscales-Task, Goal, and you will Thread.

tags
Меток нет

Реклама:

Сторонняя реклама

Это тестовая ссылка. Mainlink.ru

Статьи
Создание Сайта Кемерово, Создание Дизайна, продвижение Кемерово, Умный дом Кемерово, Спутниковые телефоны Кемерово - Партнёры