g., geographical area, aspect out-of MA, dimensions regarding mathematics abilities, intercourse, values peak, and you may book 12 months), we held the brand new heterogeneity sample. The Q shot (heterogeneity try) are finding the differences among feeling sizes, for this reason to understand more about hence prospective moderator (we.e., research features) possess starred a task within these distinctions was expected.

Geographic Region

Geographical places was indeed thought a potential moderate basis. The end result designs have been grouped into the five wider teams: All of us, Europe, China and other areas. The brand new analytical heterogeneity among the impact items try found (Q = , p = 0.01). Specifically, the research with Far-eastern samples met with the biggest feeling proportions (r = ?0.41), because the knowledge having Eu products shown the littlest feeling proportions (roentgen = ?0.21). As well, the studies with our company trials got a much bigger feeling proportions (roentgen = ?0.30) compared to the related group in Europe, while they got a smaller sized impact dimensions compared to the relevant category in China.

Intercourse

This new moderate analyses for the gender was in fact presented as a consequence of several methods. Earliest, the class about varying is in line with Ma’s (1999) study, therefore we opposed if the math anxiety-show hook up was significantly additional one of three groups (men, ladies, and you will blended); the results recommended there are no variations among the three kinds (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). Next, this research had a tendency to continue subsequent to test when you should ban the newest mistake impression in the blended classification and you will if the average correlations between men and women was basically notably more. Merely eight education one considering brand new correlation anywhere between MA and you can math efficiency otherwise necessary information would be moved to perception brands to own different genders was basically incorporated. The results suggested zero significant difference anywhere between people (roentgen = ?0.30) and guys (r = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).

Amount Height

Four values-top teams had been designed in this meta-analysis, including a standard group, junior large class, senior highest class, mix group, and you can college category. The outcomes ideal this varying got significant effects on the mathematics anxiety-performance connect (Q = , p = 0.02). Far more especially, the new senior large group met with the biggest math stress-results hook up (roentgen = ?0.44), followed closely by brand new junior large group (roentgen = ?0.39), school (r = ?0.33), elementary (roentgen = ?0.27), and you can blended category, which in fact had the smallest math anxiety-results link (roentgen = ?0.21).

Guide Ages

The present day meta-investigation consisted of the amount of time frame out-of 19 years (2000–2018). To evaluate if day had an effect on the brand new mathematics stress-results hook up, good Pearson correlation are conducted involving the guide ages and also the of the many private knowledge (roentgen = 0.twenty-seven, p > 0.05). No relationship are found anywhere between effect products as well as the guide ages ( Profile cuatro ).

Measurement regarding MA

I and additionally looked if the bills regularly take to mathematics anxiety got an impact on the new math anxiety-overall performance hook. The results suggested that the measurement out-of MA had no feeling for the math nervousness-performance link (Q = six.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, individual degree which used most other balances (e.g., the latest Math Stress Level having Elementary University College students [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] had the largest math stress-performance hook up (roentgen = ?0.41), accompanied by education which used the new MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0 citas ateas gratis.28), MASYC (r = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (roentgen = ?0.24), and AMAS (r = ?0.24), and you will personal knowledge that used the brand new MASC had the minuscule math anxiety-overall performance connect (r = ?0.15).

Dimension out of Mathematics Abilities

The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).